Knutson v. Foster
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtFybel, J.
*1078INTRODUCTION
After a three-week trial, the jury found in favor of Dagny Knutson on her fraudulent concealment and intentional breach of fiduciary duty claims against her former attorney, Richard J. Foster, and awarded her economic and noneconomic damages. The trial court granted Foster's motion for a new trial on the grounds that Knutson did not prove Foster's conduct was the cause of Knutson's damages and that Knutson had failed to offer substantial evidence of her emotional distress damages.
We reverse and reinstate the jury's verdict because the motion for a new trial was granted on…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Oasis West Realty v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Viner v. SweetCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- McLaughlin v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Little v. Stuyvesant Life Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Crouch v. Trinity Christian Center of Santa Ana, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2019
- Glick v. Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
- In Re: Koi Design LLC v. Marron Lawyers, ApcCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2026
- Kaushansky v. Stonecroft Attorneys, APCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
- Kim v. Lee CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.