Legal Opinion

Eastern Utah Broadcasting & Workers' Compensation Fund v. Labor Commission

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided March 22, 2007No. 20060370-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McHUGH, Judge:

1 Eastern Utah Broadcasting and Workers' Compensation Fund (collectively, Petitioners) seek review of an order issued by the Utah Labor Commission Appeals Board (the Appeals Board) on remand after a prior decision from this court, confirming the award of occupational disease benefits under Utah Code section 34A-3-106 to Naney M. Wood. See Utah Code Ann. § 34A-3-106 (2001). Because we conclude that the Appeals Board incorrectly applied the standard for determining whether Wood's mental condition was legally caused by her employment, we remand for further proceedings…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bonham v. MorganUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. World Peace Movement of America v. Newspaper Agency Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Esquivel v. Labor Com'n of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Lund v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. IrelandUtah Supreme Court · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kelly v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Frito-Lay & Transcontinental Insurance Co v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008
  3. Frito-Lay & Transcontinental Insurance Co v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API