O'DONOGHUE v. Laurel Savings Ass'n
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
NEWMAN, Justice.
Thomas and Margaret O’Donoghue (collectively, Appellants) appeal from the Superior Court’s Order affirming a summary judgment Order entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County (trial court) in favor of Appellee Laurel Savings Association (Laurel). Appellants request this Court to decide whether Laurel violated Sections 681 and 682 of the Mortgage Satisfaction Law (the Law), 21 P.S. §§ 681 and 682, by not recording their satisfaction of their mortgages within forty-five days of full payment. We hold that Laurel did not violate the Law because it…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Marks v. TasmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. Rieck Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Commonwealth v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Garcia v. Community Legal Services Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Kusza v. MaximonisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Basile v. H & R BLOCK, INC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Pappas v. AsbelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Jones v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Hughes v. Seven Springs Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Chepkevich v. Hidden Valley Resort, L.P.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.