Legal Opinion

Building Material & Construction Teamsters' Union v. Farrell

California Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1986No. S.F. 24915Published

1Opinion of the Court

41 Cal.3d 651 (1986)

715 P.2d 648

224 Cal. Rptr. 688

BUILDING MATERIAL & CONSTRUCTION TEAMSTERS' UNION, LOCAL 216, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

JOHN C. FARRELL, as Controller, etc., et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Docket No. S.F. 24915.

Supreme Court of California.

April 3, 1986.

COUNSEL

Davis & Reno, Duane W. Reno and Vincent J. Courtney, Jr., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

George Agnost, City Attorney, and Stephanie M. Chang, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

MOSK, J.

We must determine whether the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (MMBA)[1] requires local public agencies to "meet and…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. First National Maintenance Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. California Manufacturers Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Glendale City Employees' Ass'n v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Soule Glass and Glazing Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API