Ericksen v. Rhee
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County. Peter J. Shields, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
Plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment in an action for certain rents. The substance of the judgment was that “plaintiff take nothing from said defendants, L. G-. Siller and J. L. Siller, partners doing business under the firm name and style of Siller Bros.”
By his pleading plaintiff averred that on November 17, 1915, he leased to defendant S, K. Rhee land in Yolo County, described as follows: “For the first year, all that portion of land in the S. W. quarter of Section 33, Township No. 9 North, Range 1 East, of Mt. Diablo Merid., not now sowed to barley by the first party, and after the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stewart v. . Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Bedford v. . TerhuneNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
- Chung Kee v. DavidsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Lake Ontario Shore R.R. Co. v. . CurtissNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- The Armstrong Co. v. Shell Co. of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Webb v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- City Investment Co. v. PringleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Gilman v. NemetzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.