Martel v. Hall Oil Co.
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Blume, Chief Justice.
This is an action brought by the plaintiffs in error against the Hall Oil Company, the Midwest Refining Company and Pearl L. Eddy, defendants in error, to recover damages in the sum of $1,500,000 for unlawfully attempting to drill an oil or gas well. The ease was tried to a jury, but the court directed a verdict for the defendants, and from the judgment entered, in accordance with the directed verdict, the plaintiffs have brought their pro ceeding in error. Tbe parties will be named herein as in the court below.
On September 11, 1915, James Barquín was the owner of eighty…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hall Oil Co. v. BarquinWyoming Supreme Court · 1925
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. KishiTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- Campbell v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Hecht v. HarrisonWyoming Supreme Court · 1895
- Pacific-Wyoming Oil Co. v. Carter Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. WyomingSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Ohio Oil Co. v. SharpCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
- Roberts Construction Company v. VondriskaWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
- Sunburst Oil & Refining Co. v. CallenderMontana Supreme Court · 1929
- Erickson v. HudsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1952
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.