Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Hudson

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1952No. 2554, 2555PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Blume, Chief Justice.

The parties herein were litigants in the case of Hudson v. Erickson, 67 Wyo. 167, 216 P. (2d) 379. They are adjoining owners of lots in the Fairview Addition in the town of Evanston, Wyoming. The case above mentioned involved a strip of land three and a fraction feet in width located between the residences erected on the lots owned respectively by the parties. The foregoing case shows that a fence had been constructed between the two lots although not on the exact dividing line of the properties. It was a small chicken-wire fence, not obstructing the view between…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Andrew J. Aikens v. State of WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. State v. LangleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Burke v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Flaherty v. MoranMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Enos v. KeatingWyoming Supreme Court · 1927

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Venuto v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Bowers Welding and Hotshot, Inc. v. BromleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Hein v. LeeWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Sheridan Drive-In Theatre, Inc. v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Jenkins v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API