Pacific-Wyoming Oil Co. v. Carter Oil Co.
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Blume, Justice.
We held in the original opinion that, as disclosed upon the face of the pleadings herein, “the condition upon which the payment demanded in the petition depends, has been fairly, nay, even literally and strictly fulfilled;” and that the possibility that a future act of Congress, not likely to be enacted, which might change the present law giving lessees under the act of Congress of February 25, 1920 the preference right of renewal, is so remote, and hence of such trifling significance, that it should not be taken into consideration in determining whether such condition has been…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rogers v. MaloneyOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Wellsville Oil Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Hardy v. DeskinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
3Cited by14 opinions
- Leitner v. LonabaughWyoming Supreme Court · 1965
- Kindler v. AndersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1967
- Schaffer v. Standard Timber Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1958
- Covey v. Covey's Little America, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1963
- Martel v. Hall Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1927
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.