Legal Opinion

Hitesman v. Bridgeway Inc.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 22, 2013PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

ESPINOSA, J.A.D.

A licensed or certified health care professional may assert a claim against his or her employer pursuant to the Conscientious Employee Protection Act (CEPA), N.J.S.A. 34:19-1 to -8, based upon a reasonable belief that the employer’s conduct “constitutes improper quality of patient caref.]” N.J.S.A 34:19-3a(1) and e(l). The statutory definition of “improper quality of patient care” includes the violation of “any professional code of ethics.” N.J.S.A. 34:19-2(f). In this appeal, we consider whether plaintiffs proof, and specifically his…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pierce v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  2. Dzwonar v. McDevittSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
  3. Young v. Schering Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  4. Mehlman v. Mobil Oil Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  5. Estate of Roach v. Trw, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. James Hitesman v. Bridgeway, Inc. (072466)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
  2. Tegler v. Global SpectrumDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2018
  3. BERDZIK v. PHYSICIANS ENDOSCOPY, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
  4. BERNDT v. HEYCO PRODUCTS CORPORATIONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
  5. James Hitesman v. Bridgeway, Inc. (072466)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API