Legal Opinion
BERNDT v. HEYCO PRODUCTS CORPORATION
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 17, 2025No. 3:22-cv-01300Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY JENNIFER BERNDT, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 22-01300 (GC) (TJB) v. HEYCO PRODUCTS CORPORATION, OPINION Defendant. CASTNER, District Judge THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon Defendant Heyco Products Corporation’s Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (Rule) 56. (ECF No. 35.) Plaintiff Jennifer Berndt opposed (ECF No. 39), and Defendant replied (ECF No. 40). The Court has carefully considered the parties’ submissions and decides the matter without oral argument pursuant to Rule 78(b)…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Luis A. Fuentes v. Steven P. Perskie, Chairman of the New Jersey Casino Control Commission the New Jersey Casino Control CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.