Legal Opinion

G.G. Marck and Associates, Inc v. James Peng

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 5, 2009No. 07-4180, 07-4251UnpublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Circuit Judge.

A “sublimation mug” is a blank mug onto which images can be transferred. G.G. Marck makes and imports sublimation mugs, and competes in the sublimation mug market with companies controlled by James Peng. This appeal stems from a complex suit Marck brought against Peng and three of his companies.

Marck accused Peng and his companies of failing to mark imported mugs as “Made in China,” of transporting overweight shipments of mugs, of misstating the transactional value of mugs to U.S. Customs (and thereby underpaying duties), and of importing mugs made by prison labor, all…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. EnglerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  3. Brown v. NeebCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  4. Re/max International, Inc., Re/max Northeast Ohio Limited Partnership, Intervenors-Appellees v. Realty One, Inc., Smythe, Cramer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  5. McKay Machine Co. v. RodmanOhio Supreme Court · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rutherford v. Columbia GasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  2. Evoqua Water Techs. v. M.W. WatermarkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  3. Shy v. Navistar International Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  4. Wesco Ins. Co. v. Roderick Linton Belfance, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
  5. New Products Corp. v. Dickinson Wright PLLC (In re Modern Plastics Corp.)District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API