Shy v. Navistar International Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SILER, Circuit Judge.
The class action plaintiffs (“Shy Class”) initiated the current litigation by seeking an injunction against Navistar International Corp. (“Navistar”), claiming that Navistar’s unilateral move to substitute Medicare Part D into their medical plan violated the parties’ 1993 settlement agreement (the “Agreement”). The district court found that Navistar’s actions were in violation of the Agreement and ordered Navistar to reinstate, retroactively, the prescription drug benefit that was in effect before Navistar made the unilateral substitution.
On appeal, Navistar raises…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Local Number 93, International Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. EnglerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Williams v. VukovichCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Carla Frew v. Thomas SuehsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Volvo Powertrain CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Bd. of Cty. Comm'rs of Hamilton Cty.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Deschamps v. Bridgestone Americas, Inc. Salaried Employees Retirement PlanDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2015
- Luann Gillespie v. Liberty Life Assurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.