Paul v. Paul
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 329, Jan. T., 1919, by defendants, from decree of C. P. Schuylkill Co., May T., 1918, No. 1, on bill in equity in case of Howard I. Paul v. Levi M. Paul and. Sarah K. Paul. Bill in equity for dissolution of a partnership and for an accounting. Before Berger, J. The court entered a decree for dissolution of partnership and for an accounting. Defendants appealed. Error assigned was the decree of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Frazer,
Levi M. Paul, one of the defendants, conducted with George Heebner a partnership business in the City of Pottsville for the sale of musical instruments. This partnership was dissolved in 1895 and Paul engaged in the same business in the same city on his individual account which he continued until January 13, 1903, at which time plaintiff, Howard I. Paul, alleges a partnership agreement was made orally between him and defendants, Levi M. Paul, his father, and Sarah K. Paul, his sister. On May 31, 1904, the parties named filed in the office of the prothonotary of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Appeal of BredinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
- Jackson v. ThomsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Monongahela National Bank v. First National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Italian Co-operative Banking Ass'n v. La SpadaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Mars National Bank v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Slater v. SlaterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Capozzi v. Latsha & Capozzi, P.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Stackpole v. GrangerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
- Tarasi v. Pittsburgh National Bank, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1978
- Brobst v. Davis, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.