Legal Opinion

Capozzi v. Latsha & Capozzi, P.C.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 9, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlszewski, J.

¶ 1 Appellants Latsha & Capozzi, P.C.; Kimber L. Latsha; Glenn R. Davis; and Douglas C. Yohe appeal from the trial court’s February 27, 2001, order granting appellee Louis J. Capozzi, Jr.’s post-trial motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and awarding him a new trial on the specified issue of damages. For the following reasons, we affirm.

¶ 2 The trial court aptly summarized the facts of the case as follows:

In 1994, Louis Capozzi and Kimber Latsha worked as attorneys for the Cumberland County law firm Shumaker & Williams. They left Shumaker & Williams, and on May 23, 1994,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Jacob v. Norris, McLaughlin & MarcusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  2. Howard v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Maritrans GP Inc. v. Pepper, Hamilton & ScheetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Martin v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Cohen v. LordNew York Court of Appeals · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fearnow v. Ridenour, Swenson, Cleere & Evans, P.C.Arizona Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Fearnow v. Ridenour, Swenson, Cleere & Evans, P.C.Arizona Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API