Legal Opinion
Medstar Health v. Maryland Health Care Commission
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided June 18, 2003No. 47, Sept. Term, 2002PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BELL, Chief Judge.
The issue to be resolved in this appeal requires this Court to determine the lawfulness of a regulation, COMAR 10.24.17, the appellee, the Maryland Health Care Commission, adopted as an amendment to the State Health Plan (SHP). The appellant, Medstar Health, challenged the regulation, filing a declaratory judgment action in the Circuit Court for Howard County. It alleged that the regulation conflicted with the appellee’s statutory authority, was adopted in a procedurally improper fashion, and violated the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. After limited…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona Ex Rel. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- CTS Corp. v. Dynamics Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Lewis v. BT Investment Managers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Sass v. AndrewCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- First Union National Bank v. Steele Software Systems Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- State v. SuddithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Adventist Health Care Inc. v. Maryland Health Care CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Talbot County v. Miles Point Property, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.