Adventist Health Care Inc. v. Maryland Health Care Commission
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtBell, C.J.
The Maryland Health Care Commission (“Commission”), one of the appellees herein, is required by Md.Code (1982, 2005 Replacement Volume), § 19-118 of the Health-General Article, 1 “at least every 5 years,” to adopt a State health plan (“SHP”), § (a)(1), that shall include “[t]he methodologies, standards, and criteria for certificate of need review....” § 19-118(a)(2)(i). Moreover, the Commission is charged with developing standards and policies consistent with the SHP that relate to the Certificate of Need (“CON”) process. § 19-118(d)(1). 2 These standards, inter alia, “[s]hall address the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. People's CounselCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Bulluck v. Pelham Wood ApartmentsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Department of Natural Resources v. Linchester Sand & Gravel Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Kushell v. Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Haas v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Blackstone v. SharmaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- Frey v. Comptroller of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Schreyer v. ChaplainCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Donlon v. Montgomery Co. Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.