Legal Opinion
Sellers v. Frohmiller
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided August 3, 1933No. Civil No. 3396PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcALISTER, J.
On July 16, 1933, the petitioner, George P. Sellers, filed with the state auditor, Ana Frohmiller, a claim for $9.67 for salary as a secretary in the office of Governor B. B. Mouer for the fifteenth day of July, 1933. Being doubtful of the legality of the claim the auditor rejected it, whereupon the petitioner filed in this court a petition for an alternative writ of mandamus directing the auditor to approve the claim and draw a warrant in payment of it, or show cause why she has not done so.
The petitioner bases his claim to the writ upon the provisions of chapter 95, Session Laws of 1933,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State ex rel. Worrell v. CarrIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Bryan v. MenefeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Farrell v. OliverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
- Winsor v. HuntArizona Supreme Court · 1926
- Com. ex rel. Greene v. GreggSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- South Dakota Education Association/ NEA Ex Rel. Roberts v. BarnettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- State Ex Rel. Oster v. JorgensonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
- Crane v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1935
- Carr v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1936
- Litchfield Elementary School District No. 79 v. BabbittCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.