Carr v. Frohmiller
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
This proceeding in mandamus against Ana Frolimiller, state auditor, has for its purpose a judicial determination as to whether there are in the state treasury funds available to pay the burial expenses of a deceased old age pensioner.
The plaintiff shows by his complaint that he ivas employed for the sum of $100 by the board of supervisors of Maricopa county, acting as the old age pension commission of said county, to ■ bury one Juana Gonzales, who died while holding a certificate entitling her to a pension from the county and state; that he prepared her body for burial, and buried her on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Birmingham v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Abramson v. HardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Sellers v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1933
- State v. Ah SamNevada Supreme Court · 1880
- Ex Parte HewlettNevada Supreme Court · 1895
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Arnold v. Arizona Department of Health ServicesArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- Anderson v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
- Millett v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- Depew v. Wichita Ass'n of Credit MenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
- City of Phoenix v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1966
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.