Legal Opinion

La Rue v. Ashton Company

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 18, 1965No. 1 CA-IC 35PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEVENS, Chief Judge.

The answer to the problem presented to the Court in this matter is found in the proper definition of the leg of the human being in relation to industrial compensation. Unfortunately, the anatomical definition and the legal definition are not identical.

Mr. La Rue sustained a compensable industrial injury when he broke his left femur a short distance helow the ball which fits into the hip socket. This was the only injury. There was no injury to the socket or to the pelvis. He was granted compensation for “a scheduled injury” artd in the matter now before us he urges that he…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ujevich v. Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jaynes v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  2. Smith v. Robert N. Pyles, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  3. Woppert v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  4. Miller v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  5. Roeder v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API