Legal Opinion

Jaynes v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 16, 1968No. 1 CA-IC 153PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEVENS, Judge.

The question presented to this Court by writ of certiorari granted on petition of the injured workman, William A. Jaynes, is,, whether the petitioner is entitled to an unscheduled award pursuant to A.R.S.' § 23-1044, subsec. C.

The petitioner suffered an industrial injury on 27 April 1962. He was painting a large sign when a whirlwind toppled the- sign over, knocking petitioner off the ladder on which he was standing, causing the injury in question. The injury was diagnosed as a fracture, closed, subcapital, right hip.

The 14 May 1962 report of Dr. T. H. Taber, Jr. indicates that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gullick v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Ujevich v. Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1934
  3. La Rue v. Ashton CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Brock v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  2. Jeffers v. Pappas Trucking, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Heredia v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  4. Woppert v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  5. Milam v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API