Legal Opinion

Roeder v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 28, 1976No. 1 CA-IC 1481PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HAIRE, Chief Judge, Division 1.

The question raised on this review requires that we consider whether petitioner’s hip injury should have been considered as unscheduled for permanent disability purposes.1 It is petitioner’s contention that he was entitled to an unscheduled award. The respondent Commission’s hearing officer awarded scheduled compensation benefits for a 35% functional loss of use of the right leg.

The facts are not in dispute. Briefly stated, the conditions resulting from petitioner’s industrial injury required that he undergo an operation involving the complete replacement of his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Arnott v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Jaynes v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  3. Ujevich v. Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Miller v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Scott v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API