Legal Opinion

In re Bourns

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 18, 1958No. 6355PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWoklex, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents, 111 USPQ 851, affirming the action of the examiner in finally refusing registration on the Supplemental Register of appellant’s alleged trademark for potentiometers consisting of an elongated rectangular body provided with eyelets on two of its long sides and having a U-shaped channel member covering three of such sides except for narrow marginal portions. An adjusting screw head is located in one end.

Refusal to grant registration was on the ground that the subject matter is not capable of distinguishing applicant’s goods in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Campbell Soup Co. v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
  2. Application of Swift & CoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
  3. In Re Burgess Battery Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
  4. In re Burgess Battery Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Application of Deister Concentrator Company, IncCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  2. Application of Helena Rubinstein, Inc. (Two Cases)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  3. Application of Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  4. Application of Helena Rubinstein, Inc. (Two Cases)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API