Application of Deister Concentrator Company, Inc
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RICH, Judge.
This is an ex parte appeal from the refusal to register on the Principal Register, under section 2(f) of the Trademark Act of 1946, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1052(f), as a trademark for “ore concentrating and coal cleaning tables,” the following alleged trademark:
Use of the above since 1906 is asserted and the application, Ser. No. 31,474 filed June 6, 1957, contains the following description :
“The trademark consists of a substantially rhomboidal outline, and is applied to the goods by configurating the working surface thereof so that the exterior outline of such surface is substantially…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Mazer v. SteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- West Point Manufacturing Company v. Detroit Stamping CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
- J. C. Penney Co. v. H. D. Lee Mercantile Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- The Upjohn Company, Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee v. David Schwartz, Doing Business as Bryant Pharmaceutical Company, Defendant-Appellee-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders, Inc. v. Pussycat Cinema, Ltd. And Michael ZaffaranoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Midwest Industries, Inc. v. Karavan Trailers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- In re Morton-Norwich Products, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- Thomas & Betts Corporation and Thomas & Betts Holdings, Inc. v. Panduit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Truck Equipment Service Company, Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Fruehauf Corporation, Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.