Application of Helena Rubinstein, Inc. (Two Cases)
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ALMOND, Judge.
We are confronted here with two separate appeals from a single decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board1 af-firming the examiner’s refusal to register on the Supplemental Register appellant’s marks “PASTEURIZED”2 and “PASTEURIZED” FACE CREAM SPECIAL3 for face cream, on the ground that the word “Pasteurized” was “so highly descriptive as to be incapable of distinguishing the goods.” First use since March 1, 1923 is asserted.
We deem it appropriate to treat and dispose of both appeals in a single opinion.
It is stated in the examiner’s Answer that the testimony in a prior…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Application of Deister Concentrator Company, IncCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
- Application of Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- Application of Simmons CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
- Application of Lyman S. AllenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Application of Paul L. OsweilerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Miller Brewing Company v. G. Heileman Brewing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- In Re Northland Aluminum Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Procter & Gamble Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- In re Water Gremlin Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1980
- In re Wella Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.