Legal Opinion

In re Burgess Battery Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 4, 1944No. 4872PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLenroot, Judge

This is an appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents affirming a decision of the Examiner of Trade-Marks denying appellant’s application for the registration of an alleged trade-mark under the Trade-Mark Act of February 20,1905.

The mark sought to be registered consists of a shield design surrounded by alternating dark .and light stripes of approximately equal width applied to dry batteries and flash-light cases.

Five specimens of the mark as actually used upon appellant’s goods were attached to the application.

The Examiner of Trade-Marks rejected the application upon the ground…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fleischmann v. StarkeyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1885

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Application of Swift & CoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
  2. Application of Hehr Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
  3. Thomas v. MichaelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
  4. Burgess Battery Co. v. MarzallDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1951
  5. In re BournsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API