Legal Opinion

Coover v. Cox

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 16, 1928No. Docket No. 5281PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAIL, J., pro tem.

On December 6, 1923, the plaintiffs delivered to a real estate salesman, named Washire, in the office of defendant Cox, a cheek for one thousand dollars as a deposit upon the purchase price of certain real estate, and received from Washire a “Sales Deposit Receipt” signed “Vincent J. Cox, agent, by Vincent J. Cox Pr H W.” The check was cashed by defendant Cox. The sales deposit receipt provided for the payment of the balance of the purchase price in cash through escrow upon delivery of a deed and a guaranty of title showing title to be in the vendor “free & clear also…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hicks v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Tafft v. Presidio & Ferries RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Gold v. PhelanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. Governor v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1844
  5. Murphy v. HelmrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Sunset-Sternau Food Co. v. BonziCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Sarten v. PomattoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Lynn v. Northern Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  4. Vinye v. American Automobile Co. of Seattle, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Ingram v. GlissmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API