Coover v. Cox
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
CRAIL, J., pro tem.
On December 6, 1923, the plaintiffs delivered to a real estate salesman, named Washire, in the office of defendant Cox, a cheek for one thousand dollars as a deposit upon the purchase price of certain real estate, and received from Washire a “Sales Deposit Receipt” signed “Vincent J. Cox, agent, by Vincent J. Cox Pr H W.” The check was cashed by defendant Cox. The sales deposit receipt provided for the payment of the balance of the purchase price in cash through escrow upon delivery of a deed and a guaranty of title showing title to be in the vendor “free & clear also…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hicks v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Tafft v. Presidio & Ferries RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Gold v. PhelanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Governor v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1844
- Murphy v. HelmrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Sunset-Sternau Food Co. v. BonziCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Sarten v. PomattoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Lynn v. Northern Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Vinye v. American Automobile Co. of Seattle, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
- Ingram v. GlissmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.