Legal Opinion

Gold v. Phelan

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 5, 1922No. Civ. No. 3909PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

This is a summary proceeding brought to obtain possession of a house and premises which plaintiff alleged she was the owner of and which she alleged defendants forcibly detained in the manner described, in section 1160 of the Code of Civil Procedure. By the judgment possession of the property was directed to be delivered to plaintiff, and it was provided that the defendants pay damages in the sum of $224.14, with costs. Prom that judgment the defendants have appealed.

The main contention urged • on this appeal is that the findings of the court are not sustained by the evidence. It appears from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Duffy v. HobsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Armstrong v. LoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Grant v. EdeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Lambert v. GernerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Jones v. HowardIllinois Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ernst v. SearleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Clark v. PattersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Coover v. CoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Hicks v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Holway v. MalloyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API