Tafft v. Presidio & Ferries Railroad
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSharpstein, J.
On the twenty-second day of October, 1874, the plaintiff executed to Arthur W. Bowman a power of attorney authorizing him to transact her business generally and particularly, “to invest all and singular such sums of money as may be in his hands belonging to me in such securities and upon such terms as he may think fit and for my interest; to sell, dispose of, transfer, and deliver all or any of m37 interests in the capital stock of any association, bodies corporate or politic, and to represent me and vote for me at any and all meetings of stockholders of any and all corporations in which I…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stackpole v. ArnoldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
- Selover v. American Russian Commercial Co.California Supreme Court · 1857
3Cited by15 opinions
- Byer v. Canadian Bank of CommerceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Aronson v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Coover v. CoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Sackenreuther v. WinstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Baker v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.