Legal Opinion

In Re Water Use Permit Applications

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 2004No. 24873Published

1Opinion of the Court

93 P.3d 643 (2004)

105 Hawai`i 1

In the Matter of WATER USE PERMIT APPLICATIONS, Petitions for Interim Instream Flow Standard Amendments, and Petitions for Water Reservations for the Waiãhole Ditch Combined Contested Case Hearing.

No. 24873.

Supreme Court of Hawai`i.

June 21, 2004.

Paul H. Achitoff, David L. Henkin and D. Kapua'ala, Sproat of Earthjustice Legal Defense Fund, on the briefs, for Appellants Hakipu'u'Ohana and Ka Lahui Hawai'i and Alan T. Murakami of the Native Hawaiian Legal Corporation for Appellant Hakipu'u'Ohana.

James T. Paul, Pamela W. Bunn and Michael R. Cruise of Paul, Johnson,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Amfac, Inc. v. Waikiki Beachcomber Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In Re Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Coon v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. EastmanHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Public Access Shoreline Hawaii ex rel. Rothstein v. Hawai'i County Planning Commission ex rel. FujimotoHawaii Supreme Court · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API