Legal Opinion

Gilman v. Nevada State Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 2004No. 37974PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Agosti, J.:

On October 22, 1998, Mr. and Mrs. Slensky took their young beagle, “Gardener,” to the Green Valley Animal Hospital for routine vaccinations and for examination because the dog had experienced loose stools for four days. Appellant Bradley Gilman, DVM, asked Mrs. Slensky for permission to x-ray Gardener for an intestinal blockage before vaccinating him. Dr. Gilman did not initially perform a physical examination of the dog because it was snappish and he hoped it would calm down when separated from its owner. Dr. Gilman instructed Greg Krasch, an unlicensed…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Ward v. Village of MonroevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Martinez v. MaruszczakNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  2. New Mexico Board of Veterinary Medicine v. RieggerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Ransdell v. Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State Drywall, Inc. v. Rhodes Design & DevelopmentNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Mineral County v. State, Board of EqualizationNevada Supreme Court · 2005

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API