Legal Opinion
New Mexico Board of Veterinary Medicine v. Riegger
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided June 28, 2007No. 29,790PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SERNA, Justice.
{1} The New Mexico Board of Veterinary Medicine (the Board) issued a notice of contemplated action against veterinarian Michael Riegger, alleging violations of the Veterinary Practice Act (VPA), NMSA 1978, §§ 61-14-1 to -20 (1967, as amended through 2005). The Board considered the evidence, determined that Riegger violated several provisions of the VPA, Section 61-14-13(A), and ordered Riegger to fulfill several conditions, including payment of $22,021.83 in costs associated with the disciplinary proceeding. According to the Uniform Licensing Act (ULA), “[l]icensees…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Roth v. ThompsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. DeGraffNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
- Regents of the University of New Mexico v. New Mexico Federation of TeachersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. JAVIER M.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Baker v. HedstromNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
- Marckstadt v. Lockheed Martin Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- Starko, Inc. v. PRESBYTERIAN HEALTH PLANNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- Tri-State Generation & Transmission. Ass'n. v. D'AntonioNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
- Starko, Inc. v. Presbyterian Health Plan, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.