Legal Opinion

Ransdell v. Clark County

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 2008No. 48592PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Cherry, J.:

This appeal raises the issue of whether sovereign immunity principles apply to shield a county from civil liability in an action to recover damages following abatement of a nuisance. Although Nevada has waived its sovereign immunity by statute, exceptions to the waiver apply, including one that protects political subdivisions of the state from liability for their discretionary acts. As we recently adopted in Martinez v. Maruszczak the federal two-part test for determining whether the discretionary-function exception to the general waiver of sovereign immunity…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Wood v. Safeway, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Buzz Stew, LLC v. City of North Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. LongSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
  2. Sergio Momox-Caselis v. Tara DonohueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  3. Glover-Armont v. CargileCourt of Appeals of Nevada · 2018
  4. Amistad Christiana Church v. Life is Beautiful, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2015
  5. Ansara v. MaldonadoDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2022

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API