Legal Opinion

Harrelson v. . Cox

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 28, 1935PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

We think there was error in dismissing the action as upon demurrer to the complaint. Where a mortgagee takes from his mortgagor a deed for the mortgaged premises, under circumstances such as here alleged, the transaction is open to investigation, with the burden of fairness upon the mortgagee. Hinton v. West, post, 708; Jones v. Williams, 176 N. C., 245, 96 S. E., 1036; Cole v. Boyd, 175 N. C., 555, 95 S. E., 778; Jones v. Pullen, 115 N. C., 465, 20 S. E., 624. In this jurisdiction the principle is often referred to as the “doctrine of McLeod v. Bullard ” 84 N. C., 516, approved on rehearing,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McLeod v. . BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  2. Jones v. . PullenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  3. Dix-Downing v. . WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  4. Cole v. BoydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  5. Cole v. . BoydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McNeill v. . McNeillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. Gurganus v. McLawhornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. Gurganus v. . McLawhornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  4. Massengill v. . OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Carroll v. RountreeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API