Legal Opinion

Massengill v. . Oliver

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 25, 1942PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.

To escape the bar of the statute of limitations, C. S., 441 (9), when pleaded, an action “for relief on the ground of fraud or mistake” must have been commenced within three years from “the discovery by the aggrieved party of the facts constituting the fraud or mistake.”

The exceptive assignment determinative of this appeal presents for decision only this question: Is this an action for relief on the ground of fraud ? The decisions in this jurisdiction indicate an affirmative answer.

It is here a well settled principle that “where a mortgagee buys the equity of redemption of his mortgagor, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McLeod v. . BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  2. Jones v. . PullenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  3. Pritchard v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  4. Hall v. . LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  5. Cole v. BoydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Vail v. VailSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Patterson v. DAC Corp. of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Cole v. . BoydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  4. Curry v. AndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Lee v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API