Legal Opinion
Huchzermeyer v. AT & T Communications
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided June 21, 1990No. Civ. No. 1:89-cv-274-WCOPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
O’KELLEY, Chief Judge.
This case is presently before the court on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. After considering the entire record and the arguments of the parties, the court *100concludes that it is appropriate to enter judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth below, the defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted.
Factual Background
The plaintiff Richard K. Huchzermeyer was employed by the defendant AT & T Communications for twenty-two years. He held various positions during his tenure, mostly in the area of public/media relations.
In January…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- William L. Tippens, Deceased, Nell P. Tippens, Individually and as Widow of William L. Tippens v. The Celotex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Samples v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Mary B. GRIGSBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. REYNOLDS METALS COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Huchzermeyer v. At&t CommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Shore v. AW Hargrove Ins. Agency, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
- McCray v. Florida Gypsum, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2025
- Ward v. Dept of NavyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2025