Shore v. AW Hargrove Ins. Agency, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SPENCER, District Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons stated hereinafter, Defendant’s motion is hereby GRANTED.
I
On October 19, 1993, Plaintiff Phyllis F. Shore filed a charge of discrimination with the EEOC alleging that her former employer, A.W. Hargrove Insurance Agency, Inc., (“Hargrove”) had discharged her and later refused to rehire her because of her age in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq. (“ADEA”). The EEOC determined (1) the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Loose v. General Dynamics CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2019