Legal Opinion

Hamm v. Howard

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 19, 1949No. 4-9024PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeflar, J.

This case involves a decree by the Chancellor awarding to appellees Howard and Whitsitt, attorneys at law, a fee of $200, the award being against both Hoe Hamm and his wife Mrs. Marie Hamm. Only Mrs. Hamm appeals.

On March 12, 1949, appellee Howard filed for Hoe Hamm a bill in equity for an accounting and dissolution of partnership against Mrs. Hamm. At that time Hamm and his wife had been separated for one week. Previously they had worked together in a liquor store, inherited by her from a former husband, in which the bill asserted that they were partners. Appellee Whitsitt became associated…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Slayton v. RussSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  2. Missouri Pacific Transportation Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Henry, Walden & Davis v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  2. Myers v. MuussSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  3. Monsanto Chemical Co. v. GrandbushDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1958
  4. Henry, Walden & Davis v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API