Legal Opinion

Henry, Walden & Davis v. Goodman

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 7, 1987No. 87-120Published

1Opinion of the Court

741 S.W.2d 233 (1987)

294 Ark. 25

HENRY, WALDEN & DAVIS, Appellant,

v.

Tony Gene GOODMAN, Appellee.

No. 87-120.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

December 7, 1987.

Jerry Cavaneau, Searcy, for appellant.

Bill Bristow, Jonesboro, for appellee.

PURTLE, Justice.

The appellant law firm, which had been discharged by its client prior to the filing of suit, intervened in its former client's action for personal injury damages against a third party. The intervention sought to enforce a lien for attorney's fees upon the proceeds of any recovery by the client, the appellee herein. The appellant asked for one-third of the…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Heinzman v. Fine, Fine, Legum & FineSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
  3. Henry, Walden & Davis v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  4. Brodie v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878
  5. Colclasure v. Kansas City Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API