Legal Opinion

Kurtz v. Dickson

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 8, 1953No. Record 4078PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtSpratley, J.

This is a suit for a declaratory decree to determine who is entitled to the contributions made by the late Daniel E. Hobbs to the Employees’ Retirement System of the City of Norfolk, Yirginia, while he was a police officer of the said city. The suit was instituted by Ann Clatie Hobbs, the widow of Daniel E. Hobbs, against the City of Norfolk and Lucille Kurtz. Lucille Kurtz was the first wife of the deceased, from whom deceased had obtained an absolute divorce. William P. Dickson, Jr., administrator of the estate of Hobbs, was, at his request, joined as a party defendant. A separate answer to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tromp v. National Reserve Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  2. Pate v. Citizens & Southern National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  3. Vellines v. ElySupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
  4. Hergenrather v. State Mutual Life Assurance Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1946
  5. Herdman v. McCormickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Southerland v. Estate of SoutherlandSupreme Court of Virginia · 1995
  2. Sowell v. Teachers' Retirement SystemMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Pitts v. VaughanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. Duncan Ex Rel. Will of Duncan v. Investors Diversified Services, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  5. Pitts v. VaughanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API