Legal Opinion

Pitts v. Vaughan

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 1, 1983No. 82-16PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEATTY, Justice.

We granted certiorari to review the holding of the Court of Civil Appeals, 435 So.2d 81, in this case of first impression. That court applied the rule relating to the effect of a divorce on an insurance contract in finding that a divorce decree did not affect the spouse-beneficiary’s right to receive accumulated death benefits under a retirement and pension plan. We affirm.

The City of Dothan filed a bill of inter-pleader in order to determine which of two claimants was entitled to receive the death benefits of Carol Pitts Palmer, deceased. The trial court held that Timmy R.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Flowers v. FlowersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  2. Kurtz v. DicksonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1953
  3. Wolfe v. JebeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Flowers v. Director, Department of Industrial RelationsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kowalski v. UpchurchCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2015
  2. Light v. Employees' Retirement System of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API