Legal Opinion

Hergenrather v. State Mutual Life Assurance Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 1946No. Nos. 1894 and 1897PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By WISEMAN. J.

This is an appeal on law from the judgment of the Common Pleas Court of Montgomery County sustaining the motion of Plaintiff-Appellee for judgment on the pleadings in the two captioned cases.

Since the material allegations in the pleadings, the factual issues involved and the legal questions raised, are identical in both cases, they have been consolidated and.the assignments of error, briefs, and the Court’s opinion, filed in Case numbered 1894, are considered as filed in Case numbered 1897. In the interest of clarity, the Court will consider Case numbered 1894.

This is an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wallace v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Valentine v. Van SchoyckOhio Court of Appeals · 1935

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Flowers v. FlowersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  2. Kurtz v. DicksonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1953
  3. Baird v. WainwrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  4. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. SoluriDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  5. Carpenter v. CarpenterTuscarawas County Court of Common Pleas · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API