Legal Opinion

United States v. Philips Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 26, 1917No. 1789PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States .General Appraisers, Abstract 40248.

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, Judge

The merchandise, in this case consists of certain electric-light bulbs, which were dutiable at an undisputed ad valorem rate of duty under the tariff act of October 3, 1913.

The principal market of exportation of the merchandise was Eind-hoven, Holland, but entry thereof was made upon invoices which stated the price of the merchandise f. o. b. Rotterdam. In order, therefore, to state the actual market value of the goods at Eindho-ven-, the importers at entry deducted certain sums from the Rotterdam price aforesaid, upon the claim that these sums represented the nondutiable freight and shipping…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Spingarn Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  2. United States v. DowningCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Heffernan Paper Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. Kridel, Sons & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  3. Harold J. Ritter Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  4. International Minerals & Metals Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  5. Mottola v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API