Legal Opinion

Jerkins v. McKinney

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1976PublishedCited by 113 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HENRY, Justice.

These consolidated civil actions, filed pursuant to Rule 60.02, Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure, seek to have the Court set aside an underlying judgment and award a new trial.

The Chancellor dismissed the suits on motion for summary judgment, but, on appeal, the Court of Appeals reversed and remanded.

We granted certiorari primarily in order to construe and clarify Rule 60.02, Tenn.R. Civ.P.

I

This review is in the context of a complicated and unique actual background which must be noted as a prelude to the ensuing discussion.

The underlying judgment was rendered in a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Winfield Associates, Inc. v. W. L. StonecipherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  3. Wright v. DormanTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  4. State v. BomerTennessee Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Butterman v. Walston & Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by113 opinions

  1. Whitaker v. Whirlpool Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  2. Henry v. GoinsTennessee Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Jefferson v. Pneumo Services Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
  4. Henderson v. SAIA, INC.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Tennessee Department of Human Services v. BarbeeTennessee Supreme Court · 1985

108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API