Lupertino v. Carbahal
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CARTER, J. *
Plaintiffs appeal from a superior court order a temporary restraining order issued on April 10, 1972, and after hearing, an order denying a preliminary injunction to prevent a foreclosure sale of real property.
Two contentions are urged on appeal.
1. Defendants’ fraud or mistake denied plaintiffs their right to notice of default.
2. Defendants are estopped to assert that a notice of default was mailed to plaintiffs as required by section 2924b of the Civil Code.
We conclude under the particular facts of this case that plaintiffs’ second contention is meritorious and will…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. BentleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- MacLeod v. MoranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Sargent v. ShumakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Crestline Mobile Homes Manufacturing Co. v. Pacific Finance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Cox v. HeleniusWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- I. E. Associates v. Safeco Title InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Knapp v. DohertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Monterey S.P. Partnership v. W. L. Bangham, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1989
- Vega v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. California · 2009
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.