Legal Opinion
Florida, Department of Insurance v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 9, 1995No. 93-29 CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HODGES, Judge.
This case is an action to set aside a default termination as improper and to convert the termination to one for the convenience of the government. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the termination for default.
I. Background
Defendant awarded Padula Construction Company a $2 million fixed-price construction contract to build a new main Post Office in Jupiter, Florida in September 1987. Padula received a notice to proceed in October. The contract completion date was October 1988. In accordance with the requirements of both the contract and the Miller Act, Padula…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- DeMatteo Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Discount Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
- Dependable Insurance Company, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. City of Green RiverDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 2000
- State of Florida, Department of Insurance, as Receiver for Southeastern Casualty & Indemnity Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Xtra Lease, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Edge Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Engineered Maintenance Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.