Loy W. Sockman and Elliott W. Brady v. Robert C. Switzer and Richard A. Ward
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
This appeal is from a decision of the Board of Patent Interferences, one member dissenting, awarding priority to Switzer and Ward, hereafter Switzer. The interference involves Switzer application Serial No. 484,319 [484] filed January 26, 1955, as a continuation-in-part of Serial No. 606,708 [606] filed July 23 1945. 1 In issue are five counts copied from patent No. 2,667,070 to to Sockman and Brady, hereafter Sock-man, issued January 26, 1954, on an application filed March 26, 1949. Switzer was made senior party on the basis of the filing date of the parent 606 application.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Chicago Steel Foundry Co. v. Burnside Steel Foundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
- Hugh Cecil Binstead and Henry James Stockwell v. Hans Littmann and Brüno MüllerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- John Sherman Smith v. Charles Emory WehnCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Arthur Liebscher v. Wilson P. BoothroydCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Peter J. Degeorge v. Donald R. BernierCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Harrington Manufacturing Co., Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. Idas B. White, Defendant-Appellee-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Bob O. Burson v. Thomas F. CarmichaelCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Donald M. Woods v. William S. TsuchiyaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Bob O. Burson v. Thomas F. CarmichaelCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.