Legal Opinion

Arthur Liebscher v. Wilson P. Boothroyd

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided October 1, 1958No. Patent Appeal 6319PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Patent Interferences awarding priority of invention, as.to the two counts hereinafter set forth, to appellee, the junior party in this proceeding.

Involved in this interference are applications No. 310,944, filed September 23, 1952, by Arthur Liebscher, appellant herein, and No. 219,093, filed April 3, 1951, by Wilson P. Boothroyd, appellee. The Liebscher application has been assigned to Radio Corporation of America (known as RCA) and the Boothroyd application to the Philco Corporation. Liebscher has…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Deibel v. Heise & SchumacherCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  2. Sweetland v. ColeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  3. Carlo v. Bocciarelli v. Charles E. HuffmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  4. Kreidel v. ParkerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
  5. Moore v. GreeneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  2. Renishaw Plc v. Marposs Societa' Per Azioni and Marposs CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  3. Texas Digital Systems, Inc. v. Telegenix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Novartis Ag, Novartis Pharma Ag, and Novartis International Pharmaceutical Ltd. v. Eon Labs Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  5. Amgen, Inc. v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API