Legal Opinion
Chicago Steel Foundry Co. v. Burnside Steel Foundry Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 20, 1943No. 8017PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EVANS, Circuit Judge.
Working in the molding and foundry art, Herman J. Georgen produced a product for which he obtained a patent, No. 1,926,092, bearing date, September 12, 1933. The product, which is covered by said patent, he called “Apparatus For Forming Feed Screws and Conveyers.”
It was promptly accepted by the trade, so he claims, and, because of lessened cost and desirable attributes, became popular with the industry.
Georgen’s apparatus is used in casting screws of length and size such as are used in stokers, etc. It is in the making of screws which act as conveyers and are long and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Autogiro Company of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Intellicall, Inc. v. Phonometrics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Bert O. Jonsson, Besam Ab and Besam, Inc. v. The Stanley Works, the Stanley Works v. Besam, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Inglett & Company, Inc. v. Everglades Fertilizer Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Lear Siegler, Inc. v. Aeroquip Corporation and Midtown Ignition and Parts Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.