Legal Opinion

Gaston County Dyeing MacHine Co. v. Northfield Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 4, 2000No. 10PA99PublishedCited by 129 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRYE, Chief Justice.

In this case, the trial court reformed primary and excess policies covering plaintiff so as to afford full coverage to defendant Rosenmund, Inc. (Rosenmund); applied the “injury-in-fact” date in determining when damage to property occurred; concluded that the applicable policy period was a one year period beginning 1 July 1991; and ruled that the policy issued by intervenor was excess to all other coverage available to Rosenmund. The Court of Appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part the trial court’s order. We allowed discretionary review to determine the correctness…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Woods v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. C. D. Spangler Construction Co. v. Industrial Crankshaft & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Allstate Insurance Co. v. Shelby Mutual Ins. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. West American Insurance Co. v. Tufco Flooring East, IncCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Fidelity Bankers Life Insurance v. DortchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by129 opinions

  1. MacKinnon v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Donegal Mutual Insurance v. BaumhammersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Belt Painting Corp. v. TIG InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Pure Tech Systems, Inc. v. Mt. Hawley InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  5. Register v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004

124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API