Legal Opinion
United States v. Simmons
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
Decided March 16, 2001No. NMCM 9900723PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRICE, Judge:
The appellant stands convicted by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members. At trial, the appellant pleaded guilty to one specification of unauthorized absence in violation of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. *886§ 886. He pleaded not guilty to one specification of rape and one specification of unlawful entry in violation of Articles 120 and 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 920 and 934.1 The court-martial acquitted him of unlawful entry but convicted him of rape. The adjudged and approved sentence was confinement for 12 months, reduction to E-1,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. PraterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
- United States v. DavenportUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
- United States v. KhoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
- United States v. FairclothCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Chief Warrant Officer Four ELMER F. HOFFMAN, IIIArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
- United States v. HarrowUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2006
- United States v. TovarNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2006